TfL situations: choose what’s happening to you
People usually arrive here after receiving a letter, being stopped, or being asked to attend an interview. Pick the closest match below. Each link explains what it usually means and the safest next step.
I received a TfL investigation letter (14 days to respond)
You’ve been asked to reply within a short deadline. The key is not to ignore it, and not to rush a response that creates admissions.
TfL wants to interview me under caution (IUC)
An interview under caution is serious. What you say can be used later. It’s usually a bad idea to attend unprepared.
I received a Single Justice Procedure Notice (SJPN)
This is court paperwork. Deadlines matter and ignoring it can lead to conviction in your absence.
TfL says I used the wrong ticket or Railcard
This often turns on intent, evidence, and what was said when you were stopped. A rushed apology can backfire.
TfL says I travelled without a valid ticket
Sometimes there’s a straightforward explanation. Sometimes TfL treats it as fare evasion. The stage you’re at matters.
I missed the deadline to respond
Missing a deadline doesn’t automatically mean prosecution, but it can push the case forward. Acting quickly still helps.
I already replied and now I’ve heard nothing
Delays are common. The important thing is keeping copies, tracking dates, and knowing what the next letter might be.
I paid a penalty fare, but TfL is still investigating
Penalty fares and prosecutions are different routes. It’s worth clarifying exactly what TfL is pursuing.
Want us to confirm the stage you’re at?
Upload the letter you received and a short summary. We’ll confirm the likely stage and outline realistic next steps.
Most people contact us after an investigation letter, interview request, or court paperwork.
Not legal advice. No outcome is guaranteed. Not affiliated with Transport for London.